- Services Clients :
- 00221 33 827 45 75
- 00221 78 177 29 52
- contact@koundagroupe.com

The Offending Article: an judge that is australian ruled that Bet365 may maybe not refer to its first deposit bonus as ‘free’ when there are in fact play-through requirements.
Bet365 is more likely to be greatly fined by the Australian Federal Court following a judge ruled last week that the operator’s first deposit promotion was deceptive and misleading.
The bonus model, variants of which are in typical usage through the gambling industry, offered ‘$200 free bets for new customers.’
An asterisk then directed visitors to print that is small qualified play free online pokies more chilli the regards to the offer: that customers who deposited $200 could be needed to play through up to AUS$1,200 before the full bonus would be unlocked.
But that has beenn’t enough to save the ad from being ‘false’ and ‘deceptive’ in the optical eyes for the prosecution therefore the judge.
Ruling in favor associated with competition that is australian Consumer Commission, which had brought the case against Bet365, the judge said that ‘new customers who’d maybe not formerly used such forms of services were drawn into this internet of deception.’
‘Compliance is Essential’
The government that is australian pledged to modernize the country’s outdated gambling laws to make them more relevant to the new landscape of internet betting.
Sports betting advertising, particularly television spots that advertise in-play betting during big games, probably will be highly scrutinized, with numerous politicians calling for a clamp down.
‘This judgment causes it to be clear that organizations cannot make use of the term ‘free’ in offers to consumers where any conditions that seek to neutralize the ‘free’ nature of this offer are not demonstrably identified. Inducements like free wagers run the risk of signing up new and inexperienced gamblers based on a claim that is deceptive’ ACCC chairman Rod Sims.
‘Compliance with the Australian Consumer Law is vital for several companies that sell to Australian consumers, irrespective of geographic location,’ he added. ‘The ACCC will need action where it believes individuals are being misled, especially in emerging markets where you will find potentially vulnerable consumers.’
Risk Free to Risqué
It is not the time that is first operators have fallen foul of authorities with this kind of promotional activity.
Earlier this Unibet was in hot water with the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) after offering a ‘risk free’ betting promotion on English Premier League soccer year.
The ASA ordered the business to pull the advertising because it said the language used was ‘misleading.’
But in relevant news, mischievous industry marketing guerilla Paddy energy has discovered itself, for once, on the right side of this regulatory authorities.
The UK advertising watchdog cleared an advertising run by the operator in a UK newspaper that is national promoted chances on the next president of FIFA. The campaign displayed a picture of the embattled incumbent, Sepp Blatter, bearing the legend: ‘Just f*** off already!’
‘We considered that readers of that section were likely to understand that the advertisement was meant to be described as a lighthearted comment on the ongoing allegations of corruption within FIFA, and in specific the controversy surrounding Sepp Blatter’s tenure as FIFA president,’ the ASA ruled. ‘in that context, the use was considered by us of ‘f***’ was unlikely to cause offence to readers.’
Card Counter Suing Hard Rock Resort Over Winnings
A gambler alleges that the Hard Rock Café illegally detained him and confiscated his winnings from an effective blackjack card session that is counting. (Image: Hard Rock)
Card counters are used to being provided a hard time by casinos, and when they’re caught, they truly are used to being told that their company isn’t wanted any longer.
But despite everything you could have seen in movies, benefit players usually get to keep whatever they’ve already won, rendering it a big deal whenever a gambler says the casino stole their chips.
That’s exactly the claim being made by Thom-Matthew Kho of the latest Jersey, who says that the Hard Rock Hotel in Las Vegas illegally detained him and stole his winnings after they figured down that he had been card counting at the casino’s blackjack tables.
In accordance with Kho, $3,625 in chips were taken from him by casino workers.
Card Counting Draws Attention from Casino
Kho also alleges that the casino did not follow appropriate procedures following the incident. Their lawsuit claims that the Hard Rock never contacted the Nevada Gaming Control Board concerning the dispute.
According to Kho, the incident took place on the weekend of August 22-23.
He admits which he was card counting in blackjack games at the casino as he noticed that he had been watched by casino personnel.
At that true point, Kho decided maybe not to push his luck and moved towards the casino cage to cash down. He had been surprised to get that the workers there were asking him for his identification.
In the problem, Kho notes that he failed to wish to offer ID to the casino, as he ‘was perhaps not legally necessary to provide identification [and] desired to maintain their anonymity and privacy.’ That resulted in security guards approaching him and demanding their identification, at which point he again said and refused that he simply desired to leave the casino.
Kho Taken to Security Workplace
The lawsuit then claims that the security personnel told Kho that ‘because the casino is personal property, [he] did not have the ability to leave until he complied with [the casino’s] demands for identification.’ That generated Kho being handcuffed right in front of other customers, then being taken up to a security workplace.
‘Plaintiff, within the security office, was physically searched against his will,’ the lawsuit says.
This is the point at which Kho’s complaint states that the casino was required to inform their state’s gaming control board about the specific situation, a step he says was never taken.
Within the lawsuit, Kho alleges that he suffered some small injuries and emotional stress due to the actions regarding the casino.
He is seeking both punitive and real damages from the casino, and it is hoping to be awarded more than $10,000.
Kho has been represented by Robert Nersesian, a Las Vegas attorney who has represented other gamblers in comparable situations within the past.
Nersesian is also currently representing a gambler involved in a similar case in Reno.
Boxout: Card Counting
Card counting may be the name given to techniques utilized to keep track of the cards that have been placed into play during a blackjack game, permitting gamblers to have a good idea associated with deck composition that is remaining.
Players can utilize that knowledge to position bets with an edge contrary to the casino.
Because these techniques do not require any devices or manipulation regarding the game, card counting is legal in almost all jurisdictions; nevertheless, casinos usually have the right to refuse to allow card counters to carry on playing blackjack.
The Debate Over Georgia Legalizing Casino Gaming Continues
State Rep. Matt Ramsey (R-Peachtree City) believes there’s ‘more impetus’ now for casino video gaming in Georgia than there’s been in past years. (Image: thecitizen.com)
Georgia lawmakers met at a hearing to discuss the possibility of permitting casino gambling in the state monday
Atlanta is amongst the largest metropolitan areas in the US that doesn’t have some kind of Las Vegas-style video gaming, but efforts to introduce a casino bill in the past has been met with quick shrift by the legislature.
But now, it seems, energy for the pro casino movement is growing. Lawmakers want to use casino gaming to grow its lottery-funded HOPE scholarship, a scheme that will pay tuition for their state’s brightest students, as well as the proposal has garnered popularity for the casino push.
Over 100 people packed the hearing space to argue the pros and cons on with the debate set to continue through today (Tuesday) monday.
As it proposes an amendment to the constitution the bill would go to a general public referendum, nonetheless it would have to be approved by a two-thirds majority into the legislature to achieve that phase.
The debate over Georgia casino that is legalizing has been hotly contested for months.
Growing Impetus
If approved the bill would limit the quantity of casinos in their state to just six in five various areas. Atlanta is the only city that would be allowed to host several casino.
‘It’s hard to get a feeling of where people is on this,’ said Rep. Matt Ramsey (R-Peachtree City), who co-chaired the hearing. ‘I think there’s a bit that is little of an impetus now to get brand new income sources for HOPE.’
‘We believe that a restricted quantity of destination gambling enterprises of the type in this bill today will ensure term that is long for the program,’ added Chip Lake of the Committee to Preserve HOPE scholarships.
MGM Proposal
However, Professor John Kindt associated with the University of Illinois, who testified and only RAWA at the hearing that is recent Washington DC, urged caution.
‘Bankruptcies go up eighteen to forty two per cent as individuals lose their money,’ said Kindt, a vocal anti-gambling. ‘People resort to criminal activity because they lose their funds. And we have new addicted gamblers which double around these gambling facilities. And it’s comparable to drug addictions, while the taxpayers have to fund all of this.’
Also present were representatives of MGM Resorts International who are due to stage a presentation today of these pitch for a create a $1 billion casino in downtown Atlanta.
Clark Dumont, MGM Resorts spokesman, has previously called Atlanta a ‘beautiful market’ that boasts a perfect demographic, citing the proximity to the world’s airport that is busiest and Atlanta’s big convention industry.
The MGM proposal would create 3,500 jobs and experience tens of vast amounts for Georgia’s HOPE scholarship, he said.
