- Services Clients :
- 00221 33 827 45 75
- 00221 78 177 29 52
- contact@koundagroupe.com

Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton says that people should ‘presume corruption’ was behind the 2011 Wire Act interpretation by the Department of Justice.
Judicial Watch claims that ‘no one is above the law’ in its logo, plus the watchdog team is testing that theory with a lawsuit aimed at the Justice Department.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has long maintained that its 2011 opinion how the 1961 Wire Act should be interpreted ended up being a routine decision that came in response to needs for quality from two states interested in offering online lottery seats.
Nevertheless the conservative activist team is seeking more details on theat choice, and says that the DOJ hasn’t been cooperative up to now.
Judicial Watch announced this week they had filed a lawsuit up against the DOJ, one that alleges the division has not cooperated with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed last year.
The organization filed that request in October, looking for ‘any and all records concerning, regarding, or associated to your December 23, 2011 ruling to legalize non-sports betting over the web, including but perhaps not restricted to any records in the legal basis for the ruling under the illegal Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006.’
According to the group, the DoJ was required to respond for them by 18, but did not february. That prompted a lawsuit to be filed in United States District Court month that is last.
Advice Found Wire Act Applied to Sports Betting Just
The 2011 viewpoint by the Department of Justice found that the Wire Act was just applicable to betting on sporting events, and not to all kinds of gambling. That started the door for states to modify online casino games and poker, a move that three states took therefore far: nj-new jersey, Nevada, and Delaware.
However, those opposed to the spread of online gambling have long questioned the Justice Department’s decision, and Judicial Watch reiterated those concerns in its press launch about the lawsuit.
‘ The executive action ‘legalizing’ on the web gambling is another example of the Obama administration’s habit of placing politics above law,’ said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. ‘When the Justice Department reverses its very own interpretation of the federal statute so quickly and so totally, the American folks have the right to know why.
‘And given that the Justice Department is willing to break federal records legislation rather than disclose information, Americans can presume corruption behind its decision to unilaterally legalize widespread Internet gambling.’
Interpretation Agreed with Case Law
Not everyone agrees with the indisputable fact that the DOJ ‘reversed’ the interpretation of the Wire Act within the way that experts claim. The idea that the Wire Act only used to sports betting has been around since well before 2011, in the end.
In a 2002 case, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the Wire Act ‘concerns gambling on displaying events or contests’ and that the Wire Act ‘does not prohibit non-sports internet gambling.’
However, the argument that the DOJ opinion had been an unwarranted reversal of standing law remains being a argument that is chief those who oppose the regulation of the online gambling industry in the United States. Chief among them is Las Vegas Sands CEO and Chairman Sheldon Adelson, who formed the Coalition to Stop Web Gambling (CSIG) in a effort to prevent gambling that is online from moving forward.
The most significant part of that effort was the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bit of legislation that would unambiguously ban many types of online gambling throughout the usa. While the bill happens to be introduced both in the home and Senate, it has received very movement that is little the current Congress.
Oklahoma State Senator Pleads Guilty to Gambling With Better Business Bureau Cash
Rick Brinkley was a state senator in Oklahoma until this week as he finally admitted to stealing $1.8 million from the Better Business Bureau to support their addiction to gambling. (Image: Matt Barnard/Tulsa World)
Former Oklahoma State Senator Rick Brinkley (R-District 34) is lot like a lot of us: he likes to gamble.
The only real difference is that he prefers carrying it out with another person’s cash.
On Thursday, Brinkley stepped down from the state legislature after admitting in federal court which he stole $1.8 million from the Eastern Oklahoma Better Business Bureau (BBB), a nonprofit agency he served as president and CEO.
In his plea deal, Brinkley said he was guilty of five counts of wire fraud and another count of falsifying a tax return.
He’ll face as much as 20 years in jail and $500,000 in fines when he’s sentenced November 20th. ‘I used BBB’s credit card to produce cash withdrawals at automated teller machines located within casinos to help my gambling habit,’ Brinkley admitted.
Start With Trust
That’s the motto for the Better Business Bureau, however now all in Oklahoma and around the national country know to not trust Mr. Brinkley.
The vice that is former regarding the Senate Finance Committee and person in the Appropriations, Pensions, and Rules committees, the 54-year-old was at the center of their 2nd term when this week’s revelations found light.
Speaking of revelations, Brinkley, whom learned theology at Oral Roberts University, was a pastor before entering politics, but he has seemed to overlooked his morality that is spiritual due his gambling addiction.
Earlier this year, the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI) looked into the BBB’s seemingly dismal financial predicament after Brinkley told employees money was running low, which led to an internal review.
Following 8 weeks of inpatient gambling addiction therapy, Brinkley told the court, ‘we made efforts to conceal my use that is fraudulent of funds. We falsified the names of BBB vendors, created invoices that are false diverted BBB money for cash.’
While Brinkley didn’t reveal in his testimony which games enthralled him the most, he apparently wasn’t very good at it, losing almost $2 million.
Politicians Love Money
It is an inherent element of human being nature to want, and for many in America, that want is just a economic one, but while most moral citizens would not ever steal, politicians undoubtedly don’t help their generalized public viewpoint of being bought or being corrupt when circumstances like this come to light.
Once the current 2016 election cycle gets underway, a basic theme among GOP frontrunner Donald Trump is that the rest of his Republican counterparts have all been influenced by donors and super PACs.
‘Our system is broken,’ Trump stated at the Fox News that is first debate. ‘I give everybody, when they call I give, and do you realize what? When i would like something from them two years later on, 36 months later, I call them and they are there my football club player registration for me.’
In 2012, $34.29 million in political lobbying was spent by gambling enterprises and gambling companies, even though accepting such monies undoubtedly isn’t unlawful, it highlights the big company nature of running for office.
Though many stories exist of shady deals between politicians and gambling professionals, also as lawmakers whom became addicted to gambling itself, no story is more infamous than that of Maureen O’Connor.
The heir of her husband Robert Peterson’s wide range, the founder of Jack-in-the-Box, O’Connor served as north park’s very first mayor that is female 1986 and 1992.
After her spouse’s death, she proceeded to gamble more than $1 billion, losing some $13 million and in the end stealing $2 million from his charity and making it bankrupt.
O’Connor’s wagering $1 billion and only losing $13 million is actually quite impressive.
If Brinkley would have been that good, he’d likely still be running the BBB.
Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras Resigns
Alexis Tsipras has resigned his post as Prime Minister, but he can run for work again in a snap election. (Image: Michael Kappeler/Corbis)
The Greek crisis that is financial for a new twist this week, as Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras resigned his post in the wake of criticism from members of his own celebration.
Tsipras is hoping to regain his chair in a snap election, one that is planned to be held on September 20.
Tsipras announced his choice in an address that is televised after which it he presented their resignation to Greek President Prokopis Pavlopoulos.
‘ I want to be honest with you,’ Tsipras stated in his address. ‘We did not achieve the agreement we expected before the elections. january’
Tsipras Decided to Austerity Measures to Appease Creditors
Tsipras was elected on promises which he would avoid further austerity measures in the united states. However, with the Greek economic system near collapse early in the day this year, and speculation beginning to mount that Greece might be taken out of the Eurozone, Tsipras eventually accepted the needs of creditors despite their earlier convictions.
‘I feel the deep ethical and responsibility that is political put to your judgment all I have actually done, successes and problems,’ Tsipras stated.
Tsipras’ help for the agreement with creditors caused something of a revolt among members of their own party, Syriza. The leftist party was largely opposed to taking another bailout from European creditors, particularly if it could need reductions in pensions and other federal government spending cuts along with tax increases.
Greece just received the first portion of its latest bailout, a €13 billion ($14.8 billion) payment that will allow the united states to avoid defaulting on its debts to the European Central Bank. The bailout package is worth approximately €86 billion ($97.7 billion), with funds coming over the course of three years.
Snap Elections Could Work In Tsipras’ Favor
For Tsipras, calling for snap elections now can be a shrewd gambit that is political to strengthen his position, though it is really not without risk. Right now, Tsipras remains favored by voters in Greece, as numerous of the most extremely painful austerity measures have actually yet to come into spot.
Since the election is coming less than a year since the previous vote, the Greek constitution specifies that other party leaders be given the opportunity to form a government before resorting to a different election. But while Vangelis Meimarakis, leader of the conservative New Democracy party, has said he will make an effort to form a governing coalition, it seems highly unlikely he should be able to achieve this.
Probably the most polling that is recent in Greece found that more than 33 percent of voters supported Syriza, rendering it the most popular party into the nation. However, with out a bulk of seats in government, it’ll need coalition partners to govern after having a election that is snap.
While the bailout happens to be controversial, it’s likely to achieve its definitive goal: keeping Greece in the euro for the foreseeable future. While which had experienced concern, Paddy energy now puts chances of Greece leaving the Eurozone in 2015 at 10-1, with bettors having to bet at 1-50 chances if they want to place cash on Greece perhaps not leaving instead.
So far, the Greek financial crisis seems to have had little impact on the nations gambling industry. While the government has recently published more powerful regulations on video lottery terminals in the country, which caused a delay in rollouts of the games this summer, those techniques were evidently unrelated to the austerity measures.
